News
 
Gravatar

The Texas Legislature is considering a bill to authorize the Texas Animal Health Commission to adopt federal Animal ID regulations, one of which would require every chicken to have a permanent leg band with a unique ID number when it is sold or moved to a new location. While commercial hatcheries and large confinement operations would be exempt, the requirement would impact both small farmers and people with backyard chickens.

The bill also gives the agency a blank check to adopt other federal regulations governing animal ID for all kinds of livestock animals, including goats, sheep, pigs, cattle, and horses. The federal regulations govern the movement of animals between states, which is not a frequent occurrence for small farmers. But imposing those same regulations on every movement within the state could cause significant problems for small farmers.

No one knows what federal rules may be adopted next year or 5 years from now, which means that the Texas Legislature is buying into the federal regulations without even knowing what they will be!

Tagging animals, without having any connection to disease control measures, is unnecessary and time-consuming. This creates a significant burden for small farmers, ultimately making it more difficult for them to remain viable sources of local food for the community.

 

TAKE ACTION


1. Call your Texas State Senator ASAP! SB 1233 is set for a vote this Thursday, April 25, so time is short!

You can find out who represents you at www.fyi.legis.state.tx.us/Home.aspx or by calling the Capitol Switchboard at 512-463-4630. The switchboard can connect you to your Senator’s office, and the call takes just a couple of minutes.

Message:
“Hi, my name is _____ and I am a constituent. I urge Senator ______ to vote against SB 1233, the Animal ID bill. While the bill sounds like it limits the Texas Animal Health Commission’s authority, it actually does the opposite – it is giving the agency renewed authority to adopt Animal ID rules. This is bad for backyard poultry owners and small farmers, and it’s ultimately bad for the community they provide food for. The state’s animal ID programs should be tied to actual disease control measures, not simply tagging animals for the sake of tagging. I urge you to oppose SB 1233 and HB 2311.”

 

2. Call your Texas State Representative. If we can’t stop it in the Senate, we need to stop it in the House. Again, you can find out who represents you at www.fyi.legis.state.tx.us/Home.aspx or by calling the Capitol Switchboard at 512-463-4630, which can connect you directly to your Representative’s office.

Message:
“Hi, my name is _____ and I am a constituent. I urge Representtaive ______ to vote against HB 2311 / SB 1233, the Animal ID bill. While the bills sound like they limit the Texas Animal Health Commission’s authority, they actually do the opposite – they are giving the agency renewed authority to adopt Animal ID rules. This is bad for backyard poultry owners and small farmers, and it’s ultimately bad for the community they provide food for. The state’s animal ID programs should be tied to actual disease control measures, not simply tagging animals for the sake of tagging. I urge you to oppose HB 2311 and SB 1233.”


3. Call all of the members of the House Calendars Committee (if you live in Austin, we encourage you to visit): their office numbers along with maps are listed here. They are responsible for scheduling bills for a vote on the House floor and can prevent the bill from ever coming to a vote in the House of Representatives.

If you are in one of their districts, please ALSO ask your friends and family in the area to call. Calls from constituents have the greatest impact! (note that the zip codes are often “split” among multiple districts).

 


MORE INFORMATION

Requiring animals to be tagged, with no connection to any testing or other disease control measure, is not the answer for animal health or food safety.

The Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) already has extensive powers to address animal diseases and to include animal ID as part of those programs. This bill, however, gives the agency authority to require animal identification solely for the sake of identification, unrelated to any real animal disease control measure.

Back in 2005, the Texas Legislature adopted a law that allowed the TAHC to impose mandatory National Animal Identification System (NAIS). NAIS would have required that anyone who owned even a single livestock or poultry animal register their property, individually ID each animal (in most cases with electronic ID such as microchips or RFID), and report their movements to the government.

The TAHC rushed forward with the first stage of NAIS, ignoring protests from hundreds of small farmers and animal owners. It was only when legislators stepped back in to stop the agency that they slowed down.

The outcry against NAIS was so great all over the country that the U.S. Department of Agriculture withdrew the program in 2009. When NAIS died, so did the agency’s legal authority to impose animal identification requirements unrelated to disease control programs.

The mandatory NAIS statute in Texas is defunct. At this moment, the TAHC can only legally require identification when it is connected to a disease control program.

HB 2311 and SB 1233 breathe new life into the statute, however, and gives the TAHC authority to require tagging by itself, with no connection to any disease control measure.

The original intent behind the bills was to address the fact that TAHC has been overstepping its bounds, most recently by issuing a mandatory cattle ID rule that requires cattle – even those going direct to slaughter – to be ear tagged. But the bills have been amended to undermine that original intent, and they now grandfather in the agency’s illegal regulation!

The same Agribusiness groups that supported mandatory NAIS are supporting this new bill. They want to give the state agency – which has a track record of ignoring the interests of small farmers – authority to mandate federal regulations on every farmer and animal owner within our state.

We need both farmers and consumers who care about small and diversified livestock farms – which are healthy sources of local food – to speak up!

Please call your Texas State Representative and Senator to urge them to vote NO on HB 2311 and SB 1233, the Animal ID bills. You can find out who represents you at www.fyi.legis.state.tx.us/Home.aspx or by calling the Capitol Switchboard at 512-463-4630.

 

MYTHS AND TRUTHS

The proponents of the Animal ID bill are fighting back with lies and half-truths. Beloware some of the inaccurate statements made by the Animal ID proponents. Be armed with the truth when you call!

CLAIM 1: The bill limits the agency’s authority.
TRUTH: Right now, the Texas Animal Health Commission has no authority to adopt mandatory animal ID requirements. It lost that authority in 2009, when the USDA withdrew the plans for the National Animal Identification System. This bill gives the agency new authority to impose more regulations on small farmers and animal owners.

CLAIM 2: We’re protected by the language that the state requirements can be “no more stringent” than the federal.
TRUTH: If the agency uses the authority given by this bill and applies the federal standards on an in-state basis, many small farmers and backyard poultry owners will be placed under significant burdens. Federal regulations only apply when the animals cross state lines, limiting their impact. Those same regulations become much more burdensome if they apply to every single movement in-state, such as neighbors selling or giving animals to each others. The federal agency comes up with a lot of bad rules, and the Texas Legislature should not simply buy into them, without even knowing what they are!

CLAIM 3: The bill doesn’t include poultry.
TRUTH: While the language of the bill does not mention poultry (or any other species), it does specifically reference the federal animal disease traceability program. You can read the federal rule here — it clearly includes requirements for tagging poultry, including keeping records for 2 years. When asked, the agency testified that the bill would give it authority for animal ID for all of the species within its jurisdiction, which includes poultry, sheep, goats, pigs, cattle, bison, and horses.

CLAIM 4: We need this bill so the agency can deal with dangerous diseases like avian flu.
TRUTH: The agency has ample authority to address animal diseases. There are seven chapters in the Texas Agriculture Code that give TAHC authority to address animal disease through testing, vaccination, quarantines, and more. The agency can even include animal ID as part of those disease control measures.

This bill is about requiring identification solely for the purpose of tracking, unrelated to any disease control program.

CLAIM 5: Small farmers were consulted in developing this bill.
TRUTH: Small farm advocates have been cut out of the process. While we knew about the original version of the bill — which had both pro’s and con’s — we were never told about the Committee Substitute version, which is significantly worse than the original, until it was unveiled at the Senate Committee hearing. At no time did the bill sponsors or any of the industry groups writing the Committee Substitute version of the bill even tell us that they were working on amendments.

On the agency side, the Texas Animal Health Commission has never included FARFA or the Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association in any working group or informal meeting.

Please call your State Senator, State Representative, and the members of the House Calendars Committee today and tell them to vote NO on Animal ID, HB 2311 / SB 1233.

Gravatar

HB 46, the raw milk bill, has gotten stalled in Committee. The Texas Medical Association is lobbying hard to kill it, and they have convinced several Committee members to vote against the bill. Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance is organizing people to make phone calls to their State Representatives. We need a flood of phone calls – as soon as possible – from the grassroots to counter them!

“Licensed raw milk producers meet extensive regulatory requirements to protect the public health and safety,” stated Judith McGeary, Executive Director of the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance. “There have been six illnesses attributed to raw milk in Texas in the last twenty years. More illnesses have been attributed to strawberries and chicken soup than to raw milk in this State, and it certainly has a better track record than raw oysters, which the Texas Legislature voted to protect last session.”

The raw milk bill (HB 46) will allow licensed farmers to sell raw milk off-the-farm, at farmers’ markets and consumers’ residences. Right now, consumers have to drive all the way to the farm every time they want raw milk. This bill will help raw milk farmers expand their markets, and help raw milk consumers get reasonable access to raw milk.

Even if you have called before, please call again! (And if you haven’t yet called, it’s more important than ever to do so). This action alert is very time sensitive; please call as soon as possible this week.

TAKE ACTION #1

Call your State Representative to urge him or her to co-author HB 46, to expand raw milk access in Texas. You can find out who represents you at www.fyi.legis.state.tx.us or by calling the Texas Capitol Switchboard at 512-463-4630. Having more co-authors is very important to show the level of public support.

If your Representative is on the Public Health Committee, it is vital that you call – and that you get as many of your friends and neighbors as possible to call! Be sure to mention the fact that you are a constituent when you call. The list of Committee members and the zip codes they represent is on the next page of this alert.

SAMPLE MESSAGE: “My name is _____ and I am a constituent. I am calling to urge Representative ____ to co-author HB 46, the raw milk bill. Raw milk is very important to me and my family. (Add a sentence or two about why you care.) Can you tell me where my Representative stands on this issue?”

More talking points are at the end of this alert. The most important points you can make are the ones that matter to you – the legislators want to know why you care about this issue. You can also see who has already co-authored the bill at the end of the Public Health Committee members list.

TAKE ACTION #2

After you call your own Representative, email all of the Committee members to urge them to vote yes on HB 46. The list of Committee members and their email addresses are below.

MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE PUBLIC HEALTH COMMITTEE:

Note: Zip codes are often “split” among several legislators. You can double check who represents you at www.fyi.legis.state.tx.us

Garnet Coleman (Part of Harris County – Zip Codes 77002, 003, 004, 006, 007, 010, 019, 021, 033, 048, 061, 075, 087, 089, 098) – Phone: 512-463-0524 / Email: Garnet.Coleman@house.state.tx.us

Nicole Collier (Part of Tarrant County – Zip Codes 76012, 76102, 76103, 76104, 76105, 76107, 76110, 76111, 76112, 7615, 76119, 76120, 76133, 76134, 76140) – Phone: 512-463-0716 / Email: Nicole.Collier@house.state.tx.us

Philip Cortez (Part of Bexar County: 78002, 006, 023, 039, 052, 073, 211, 224, 226, 227, 236, 242, 245, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255) – Phone: 512-463-0269 / Email: Philip.Cortez@house.state.tx.us

Sarah Davis (Part of Houston – Zip Codes 77002, 004, 005, 006, 007, 008, 019, 024, 025, 027, 030, 046, 056, 057, 081, 096, 098, 401) – Phone: 512-463-0389 / Email: Sarah.Davis@house.state.tx.us

Bobby Guerra (Part of Hidalgo County: 78501, 78503, 78504, 78539, 78572, 78573, 78574, 78577) – Phone: 512-463-0578 / Email: Bobby.Guerra@house.state.tx.us

Susan King (Jones, Nolan, and Taylor Counties) – Phone: 512-463-0718 / Email: Susan.King@house.state.tx.us

Lois Kolkhorst (Austin, Burleson, Colorado, Fayette, Grimes, Lavaca, and Washington counties) – Phone: 512-463-0600 / Email: Lois.Kolkhorst@house.state.tx.us

Jodie Laubenberg (Part of Collin County – Zip Codes 75002, 75048, 75069, 75074, 75087, 75094, 75098, 75166, 75173, 75189, 75407) – Phone: 512-463-0186 / Email: Jodie.Laubenberg@house.state.tx.us

NOTE: Rep. Laubenberg is a joint author on the raw milk bill. Please be sure to say “thank you!”

Elliott Naishtat (Part of the City of Austin – Zip Codes 78701, 78703, 78704, 78705, 78712, 78731, 78735, 78745, 78746, 78751, 78752, 78756, 78757, 78758, 78759) – Phone: 512-463-0668 / Email: Elliott.Naishtat@house.state.tx.us

J.D. Sheffield (Comanche, Coryell, Erath, Hamilton, McCulloch, Mills, San Saba, and Somervell counties) – Phone: 512-463-0628 / Email: J.D.Sheffield@house.state.tx.us Bill Zedler (Part of Tarrant County: 76001, 76002, 76017, 76028, 76036, 76060, 76063, 76123, 76134, 76140) – Phone: 512-463-0374 / Email: Bill.Zedler@house.state.tx.us

NOTE: Rep. Zedler is a joint author on the raw milk bill. Please be sure to say “thank you!”

SPECIAL THANKS to Representative Dan Flynn, the author of HB 46, and his joint and co-authors: Representatives Dennis Bonnen, Jodie Laubenberg, Bill Zedler, Lance Gooden, Bryan Hughes, Phil King, Lyle Larson, George Lavender, Rick Miller, John Otto, Eddie Rodriguez, David Simpson, Steve Toth, Mike Villareal, and James White.

And thank you to each of you, for taking the time to speak up for our farmers and our food. We do not have the money the other side has. Instead, we have real people who care about our food system. Thank you!

MORE INFORMATION:

Background

  • Under current law, farmers can legally sell raw milk in Texas directly to consumers under a Grade A Raw for Retail license. Texas Grade A Raw for Retail dairies are subject to regulations that meet or exceed all regulatory standards for pasteurized milk.
  • Agency regulations limit the sales to “the point of production, i.e., at the farm.” This marketing restriction burdens both farmers and consumers. Farmers who invest significant resources to become licensed face unfair limitations. Consumers who want unprocessed food must expend significant time, gas, and money on long weekly drives.
  • Texas raw milk farmers have an excellent safety record. CDC data from 1998-2008 show that there were only two reported illnesses attributed to raw milk in Texas during that time. Since 2008, there have been 4 additional illnesses allegedly linked to raw milk, for a total of 6 illnesses in 15 years.
  • Approximately 12,500 foodborne illnesses were reported in Texas between 1998 and 2010, traced to such foods as mangos, cake, beans, lettuce salads, salsa, pot pie, chicken salad, hot dogs, deli meats, and beef brisket.
  • Raw milk has a better safety record in Texas than many foods, including strawberries (29 illnesses), chicken soup (47 illnesses), and turkey (852 illnesses).

The Impact of HB 46

  • The bill does only one thing: removes the on-farm restriction on the sale of Grade A raw milk.
  • The bill makes no other change to the existing regulatory requirements for licensed raw milk producers that have been successful in protecting the public’s health in Texas.
  • Sales will continue to be limited to direct-to-consumer transactions, as they are currently.
  • The bill will not allow sales of raw milk in grocery stores.

Advantages

  • Improves the safety of raw dairy by allowing producers to transport it to consumers under safe conditions, rather than relying on consumers to remember to take coolers and ice.
  • By allowing a producer to make a single trip to serve multiple customers, rather than having each customer drive to the farm, the bill reduces vehicle miles, benefiting air quality, traffic congestion, and public safety.
  • Benefits rural economies because direct farm-to-consumer sales of raw milk can mean the difference between a net loss on the farm and a reasonable income for the farm family.
  • No negative impact on conventional grocery store sales. (Supporting data available)

If you have any questions or need more information, please contact: Judith McGeary, FARFA – (254) 697-2661 / Judith@FarmAndRanchFreedom.org